Will Marlow

Public Relations. Analysis. Photography.  

Filed under

Web Analytics

 

Do you really want more traffic on your website?

Antelope

I was just speaking to an executive at a university Annual Fund who told me that she wanted to use social media platforms to drive more traffic to her website. 

If you can relate to this desire, I need to stop you right there.  You need to understand something: you don't want more traffic.  More traffic by itself has zero value.  You want: more donors, more volunteers, more customers, and more satisfied "readers" who visit your site regularly to read your new content.  If you optimize your website so that every year you get more donors, more volunteers, and more happy subscribers, you'll win promotions, raises, praise and other good things.  If you optimize your website simply to generate generic traffic, pretty soon you'll be asking yourself why you wasted your resources to do that.

Did you like reading this blog post?  Sign up to get my new blog posts delivered by email by clicking here.

Will Marlow is a digital strategist/online marketing consultant.  He's the co-creator of  AlumniFidelity, which is a Web 2.0 fundraising platform for colleges, nonprofits and secondary schools.   He’s working with clients such as UVA, the College of William & Mary, the University of Oklahoma, and Bowling Green State University and he loves nothing better than a thorny marketing challenge.  He would love to help you market your business on the Internet, boost the fundraising numbers for your school or nonprofit, or sellout your next big event.  Email him at will@alumnifidelity.com.

Filed under  //   Annual fund   Antelope photograph   Web Analytics   Web design   Web traffic   university  

Comments [1]

When should you add new features to your website or blog?

Clocks

You should never use a new feature just because it's awesome.  This is because "awesome" isn't awesome unless it advances your goals.

My blogging platform (Posterous) added a new feature recently: this feature allows you to add "page breaks" into your blog posts, so that if someone is visiting your blog homepage, they would get to read perhaps the first paragraph, and then they would need to click "read more" to get the rest.  Most people think that this feature is nice because it allows you to fit more content on your blog homepage, but the point of it is actually very different.  If people can read your entire blog post (or, in fact, multiple blog posts if they scroll down the page) without clicking on anything, their entire visit on your website would be registered as "0.0 seconds," because analytic software always measures time on a website by subtracting the time stamp on page one from the time stamp on page two.  If there is no page two, your metrics look really boring because the visit will show up as zero seconds in duration, despite the fact that it could have lasted for 30 minutes.  Combine this with the fact that blogs typically don't require lots of clicking, and you get really boring data on blog traffic.

I doubt I'll use this feature, because even though it helps optimize your blog for analyzing traffic, it de-optimizes your blog for delivering content.  (This is because people frequently read blog posts by scanning them, and it may be a tidbit in the last paragraph of a blog post that convinces them to become a subscriber.)   I care about delivering content, not analyzing time stamps.  The features you choose to add on your website or blog should always be determined by your goals, and nothing else. 

Will Marlow co-founded AlumniFidelity to help his clients reposition their fundraising to benefit from Web2.0 technology and marketing techniques. He’s working with clients such as UVA, the College of William & Mary, the University of Oklahoma, Bowling Green State University, Randolph Macon College, and he loves nothing better than a thorny marketing challenge.  Email him at will@alumnifidelity.com.

Filed under  //   Web Analytics   Website optimization   blog optimization   blogging  

Comments [0]

How Much Do You Measure?

I think it would be interesting if Nielsen's BookScan unit installed tracking chips randomly on books, to measure reading trends.  

This would tell us:

1. How much time people spend with their books opened. 
2. How many books are never opened or read.  
3.  How many books are opened repeatedly.
4.  How many books seem to be read more than once. 
5. How many books are only read at night.
6. How many books are only read during commuting time. 
7  Which pages people like to linger on.
8. Which books seem to be read immediately following other books.

Of course, we already do this (and more) on websites, and the more that devices like the iPad and Kindle catch on, the more information like this we'll know about peoples' reading habits in general.  Going forward, I think there need to be better disclosures on websites and products about what information is collected, because (1) people ought to have a better understanding about what type of footprint they leave, and (2) businesses, schools and charities need to have a better understanding of what type of information they should be gathering, and how they should be using it.

Will Marlow co-founded AlumniFidelity to help his clients reposition their fundraising to benefit from Web 2.0 technology and marketing techniques. He’s working with clients such as UVA, the College of William & Mary, the University of Oklahoma, Bowling Green State University, Randolph Macon College, and he loves nothing better than a thorny marketing challenge.  Email him at will@alumnifidelity.com

Filed under  //   Kindle   Marketing   Privacy   Web Analytics   iPad  

Comments [0]

Day One of Twitter Experiment: Unfollowing 12,000+ People

Today I am beginning to unfollow 12,000 people, making my way down to zero.  Currently, almost everyone I am following is also following me back.  And starting last Friday, I began informing my "followers" of this experiment, and anyone who has been paying attention to my feed has had ample time to hear me announce that I am culling faux-followers, and that I will quickly begin to add people back who I interact with, or who reach out to me, or who I am interested in.  

Yesterday I wrote about what I hope to learn from doing this.

On Friday I wrote about why I am doing this.

Today I just want to write briefly about which Twitter tools I am starting with.  I am going to use Tweepi, which my friend Russ Dean helpfully turned me on to, and once I get beneath a certain level (say, around 10,000), I will use Twitter Karma, which works for Twitter accounts that are not humongous, but begins to fail when it needs to deal with too much information.

I will report back on whether these two tools are sufficient, or if I stumble upon others, or if I end up needing to unfollow folks by hand!

Will Marlow co-founded AlumniFidelity to help his clients reposition their fundraising to benefit from Web2.0 technology and marketing techniques. He’s working with clients such as UVA, the College of William & Mary, the University of Oklahoma, Bowling Green State University, Randolph Macon College, and he loves nothing better than a thorny marketing challenge.  Email him at will@alumnifidelity.com

Filed under  //   How to measure Twitter influence   Social Media   Social Media Experiment   Twitter   Twitter Influence   Unfollow   Web Analytics   Will Marlow  

Comments [3]

One Reason Facebook is Worth Billions of Dollars

(Tomorrow I'll re-continue my posts outlining my next steps in my Twitter experiment to unfollow 12,000 plus people and only re-follow legitimate accounts.  Email me with questions on that.)

Some people have a hard time understanding why Facebook is so valuable.  

It's not just the fact that it has 350 million active users.  The more important point is that before any one of those users does something on Facebook, they need to login.  That means that, unlike the great majority of websites, which analyze aggregate data and trends, Facebook has names attached to activities.  They can measure what you do.  Not just what nameless "visitors" do.  For this reason, and for a few other good reasons, Facebook has tremendous advantages that get it closer to understanding why you do things. This is the same reason why Google hit such a home run with Gmail.  People login (and stay logged in) to Gmail all day.  Then, when they search, their searches can be indexed in a personal search history.

The bottom line is, this type of system makes it a lot easier to put the right ad in front of the right person at the right time to get them to buy something.  That's why Marc Andreessen can say that Facebook will one day "be bigger than Apple" and he's not crazy, even though Apple's 2009 reven ue was $32 billion.

Will Marlow co-founded AlumniFidelity to help his clients reposition their fundraising to benefit from Web2.0 technology and marketing techniques. He’s working with clients such as UVA, the College of William & Mary, the University of Oklahoma, Bowling Green State University, Randolph Macon College, and he loves nothing better than a thorny marketing challenge.  Email him at will@alumnifidelity.com

Filed under  //   Apple   Facebook   Gmail   Google   Marc Andreessen   Valuation   Web Analytics  

Comments [0]