Will Marlow

Digital problem solving 

Filed under

Investors

 

Viable, Fundable or Proof of Concept?

(I'm going to wait a few more days before updating results of my Twitter Experiment, because data is still changing and I'd like to let a little more time pass.  In addition to updating results, I'll let you know on this blog what I plan to do next with my Twitter feed.  As always, let me know by email if you have questions about anything you're reading here, will@alumnifidelity.com.)

I had a discussion recently with a friend who is planning a company that he expects ultimately will be a strong venture capital play.  We talked about the difference between three things that are relevant to companies that want venture capital: (1) proof of concept, (2) viability and (3) fundability.

Essentially, proof of concept means that your idea has at least one buyer, and the buyer is getting some measure of satisfaction from your product.  This is different from viability, which means that your company is on its way to self-sustaining revenues.  And both are distinct from fundability, which means your business has the potential to fundamentally change the lives of a large number of people (and would provide a 10x return on a BIG cash investment).  

In a crummy economy, unless you have a track record as an exec who has managed/scaled a successful company, more and more VCs want to see your company producing self-sustaining revenues.  This shows them that you're capable of implementing, not just imagining.  In other words, the 1990s is two decades behind us, and the fact that a good idea with a little market interest was enough to get VCs to open their wallets in 1999 is irrelevant.  In 2010 you need to do everything short of scale it to get interest from pro investors.  

Is any of this a bad thing?  Not at all.  But if you start a startup today, you should know that the seas won't part after you demonstrate proof of concept or viability, but without those two benchmarks you won't be able to make the case that you're fundable either.  If you want an interesting take on this theme, check out a great post by Bill Burnham over at Burnham's Beat

Will Marlow co-founded AlumniFidelity to help his clients reposition their fundraising to benefit from Web2.0 technology and marketing techniques. He’s working with clients such as UVA, the College of William & Mary, the University of Oklahoma, Bowling Green State University, Randolph Macon College, and he loves nothing better than a thorny marketing challenge.  Email him at will@alumnifidelity.com.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Fundable   Investment   Investors   Proof of Concept   VC   Venture capitalists   Viability  

Comments [0]

One (Often Overlooked) Way Obama Affects the Economy

First of all, this post is NOT intended to be a political statement or judgment, merely an observation.  The only provocative aspect of this post is that the title could have been, "One Way the Government Affects the Economy," but instead I chose to use Obama's name because my example comes from his policies.  

Last Friday my company (AlumniFidelity) was selected to give a presentation to a room full of private investors at something called a Grubstake Breakfast, where investors evaluate new companies to see if they want to invest in them.  We were selected to appear along with four other companies out of a pool of 40 under consideration.  

As many of you know, AlumniFidelity sells software and consulting services to schools and nonprofits to help them find new donors and lower the costs of their online fundraising.  The other FOUR companies that were selected to present were ALL health care companies.  Typically, this Grubstake tries to showcase a wide variety of companies. 

The consensus in the room was that due to the stimulus, as well as Obama's general focus on health care, right now investors and entrepreneurs want to focus on certain types of health care businesses that can be expected to profit from government spending.  

When it comes to major industries, it is not a groundbreaking revelation that government spending has a major impact on shaping the economy.  However, I was surprised to see an example of government policies shaping such early-stage investment and entrepreneurial activity.  Especially since the government hasn't even started spending money that would affect these companies, and the health care policies themselves are not even finalized in any form. 

Again, I'm not casting judgment or making a political statement.  (And, for the record, my company actually benefited, because we stood out from the crowd as the only alternative for people who simply weren't interested in the health care industry.)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   AlumniFidelity   Economy   Entrepreneurs   Grubstake   Investors   Mason Business Alliance   Obama   Online Fundraising   Online Fundraising Consultant   Politics  

Comments [2]