Will Marlow - Filed under 'Followers'

January 15, 2010

Results from Day 3 of Twitter Experiment (with Chart)

In 24 hours, I have lost another 100 followers. (Remember, on the first night, I lost almost 2,000 followers, which must include all the people who use applications to auto-unfollow people who are no longer following them.) As the chart shows, my follower count stands at 8,893.

Although it is still early to look at the results for RTs and @replies, here's something interesting to chew on: In the last 12 hours, I have been retweeted or @replied approximately 23 times on one post. This is WELL ABOVE average, and a new record for any of my Tweets (my viral Tweets are typically retweeted three or four times).

This surge of retweets can be explained by two things, I suspect. First, as Twitter guru Guy Kawasaki (@guykawasaki) says, the best thing you can do to get retweeted is to Tweet good shit, and the Tweet that was responsible for almost all of the RTs and @replies was about how in just several days, the amount of money donated via text message to Haitian disaster relief has surpassed the total amount of money given to all charities and causes via text message last year. (That is interesting, and highly retweetable.)

But the second explanation is that, as I guessed, Twitter reach is not dependent solely on maximizing the number of followers you have. I had 12,700 followers on Monday. Yesterday, I had 8,940 followers. But after losing over 25% of my followers due to my own massive unfollowing, my Twitter reach (as measured simply by @replies and retweets) rose by a factor of more than 5x.

Prediction for the weekend: I still expect to see a more rapid loss of followers over the weekend, as some people tend to update their Twitter feeds only on Saturdays.

Will Marlow co-founded AlumniFidelity to help his clients reposition their fundraising to benefit from Web2.0 technology and marketing techniques. He’s working with clients such as UVA, the College of William & Mary, the University of Oklahoma, Bowling Green State University, Randolph Macon College, and he loves nothing better than a thorny marketing challenge. Email him at will@alumnifidelity.com.

Loading mentions Retweet

Filed under // Followers How to measure Twitter influence Posterous Twitter Twitter Influence Twitterholic Unfollow Unfollow Experiment

Comments [0]

January 11, 2010

Twitter Experiment Part 2: What I Hope to Learn from Unfollowing 12,000+ People

On Friday I wrote about my plan to do an experiment in which I unfollow 100% of the people I'm following right now, and then I'll re-follow only people who are not spammers or bots, and who I'm actually interested in. I am keeping a list right now of people who I interact with, or know, or who I find interesting, and I'll re-follow that list very quickly after I hit zero. If you want to be added to that list, just @reply me, or send me a DM, or email me at will@alumnifidelity.com.

On Friday I talked about WHY I was doing this. In this post, I want to talk about a few things that I hope to LEARN from doing this.

I look forward to learning:

How many people unfollow me, and thus, how many people on Twitter are only interested in following people who follow them back.
What happens to my "click through" rate.
What happens to my @reply and DM rate.
Whether this generates new word of mouth buzz and leads to new followers.
What this does to the overall visibility of my Twitter presence.

Confession: I'm also hopeful that I will be able to provide more evidence that having a large following is NOT a good measure of influence on Twitter. I believe that there is a misconception going around that a Twitter feed is only valuable if it "reaches" hundreds of thousands of strangers, as evidenced by huge follower lists. Firstly, I think that Twitter can be valuable even if it reaches ONE person who you wouldn't have reached with another mechanism. Secondly, I think that huge follower lists are faux-metrics. Hopefully my experiment can illustrate why the second point can be misleading, and possibly it can help people appreciate their small but committed core of followers, who are the source of true value on Twitter.

Will Marlow co-founded AlumniFidelity to help his clients reposition their fundraising to benefit from Web2.0 technology and marketing techniques. He’s working with clients such as UVA, the College of William & Mary, the University of Oklahoma, Bowling Green State University, Randolph Macon College, and he loves nothing better than a thorny marketing challenge. Email him at will@alumnifidelity.com.

Loading mentions Retweet

Filed under // Follower Count Followers How to measure Twitter influence Social Media Social Media Experiment Social Media Plan Twitter Unfollow Will Marlow

Comments [2]

January 8, 2010

Twitter Experiment Part 1: An Intro to My Twitter Strategy, and What I Plan To Do

(Click here for the second part of this post.)

Before I get to the problem with my Twitter strategy (and what I intend to do about it), I want to explain a few things first.

As of today, I have 12,730 followers on Twitter.

The way I've built my following is fairly simple. I post updates that are focused on my expertise (education technology, charitable fundraising, and web marketing), and I make myself easy to find for people who are interested in the same topics, I update at regular intervals daily, and I follow back individuals who follow me unless they are a spammer or look weird.

In addition to this, I have been on Twitter for awhile, and in my early days I proactively sought out other like-minded and interesting Twitterers and I introduced myself to them by following them. Many times they followed me back, @replied me, or interacted with me offline. I also talk to people via Twitter, respond to DMs, and maintain public profiles on Flickr and at this blog at www.willmarlow.com to give my followers more insight into my personality and my work. In addition to all of this, as the cofounder of AlumniFidelity.com, I am regularly interacting with customers, investors, and end-users who are tech-savvy. This has led to lots of my followers.

I also never engage in obnoxious spam activity or use obnoxious Twitter “clients” that alienate the people who I hope to interact with.

One problem with my Twitter strategy is that my liberal “follow back” approach (like Guy Kawasaki, I follow people back as part of Twitter courtesy), I have accumulated a large number of spammers and faux-followers in my following column, which I have recently gotten sick of. It occurred to me that I’m currently following a large number of feeds that I don’t read, and the fact that I’m following them increases their own credibility (spammers try to build up followes for that reason, I’m compiling a list of users who I interact with regularly, or whose insights I appreciate, or who I happen to know are legitimate users, and I’m going to unfollow all 12,400 people, with the exception of this relatively small list.

If you are NOT a spammer, and I’m currently following you, please @reply me or DM me if you want me to add you to my private list of people who I will follow back after I hit zero.

I’m not sure how long it will take me, but starting in 6 days, I’m going to unfollow all 12,400 people, until I reach zero, and then I will slowly begin adding followers who I’m truly interested in.

To summarize: problem = I’m following too many spammers and bots on Twitter. Solution: unfollow everyone, and re-follow only a select number of people who I am actually interested in.

As always, send me an email if you want to chat about any of this.

Will Marlow co-founded AlumniFidelity to help his clients reposition their fundraising to benefit from Web2.0 technology and marketing techniques. He’s working with clients such as UVA, the College of William & Mary, the University of Oklahoma, and Bowling Green State University, and he loves nothing better than a thorny marketing challenge. Email him at will@alumnifidelity.com.

Loading mentions Retweet

Filed under // Best of WM Followers Social Media Social Media Experiment Social Media Plan Twitter Unfollow Will Marlow

Comments [0]